The joy of this app is being able to use what the Dendrology at Virginia Tech website calls a "Multichotomous Key". In other words, one can choose among several choices that describe a given characteristic and may use any set of pertinent characteristics to build a query. This is opposed to the old, analog "Dichotomous Key" that sent you down a narrow branching path until you got stuck because the specimen you were looking at wasn't in flower, for example.
This is all great, but how good is their database? Can the app really help you identify your tree? I headed off to the woods to find out. With the trees ablaze in new spring foliage, I relied primarily on leaf characteristics. Frankly, this is what most people do. So running through the process with several species common to north Florida the results were as follows:
Ulmus alata (Winged elm) |
Diospyros virginiana (Persimmon) |
Cercis canadensis (Redbud) |
|
Growth Habit | Tree | Tree | Tree |
Habitat | Mesic | Mesic | Mesic |
Leaf Type | Broadleaf | Broadleaf | Broadleaf |
Flower Color | Not sure | Not sure | Red/pink |
Fruit Type | Not sure | Not sure | Not sure |
Broadleaf Type | Simple | Simple | Simple |
Lobes | No lobes | No lobes | No lobes |
Edges | Serrate | Entire | Entire |
Shape | Oval, widest below middle | Oval, widest below middle | Heart-shaped |
Thickness | Thin | Thin | Thin |
Broadleaf Arrangement | Alternate | Alternate | Alternate |
Bundle Scars | Not sure | Not sure | Not sure |
Leaf Scars | Not sure | Not sure | Not sure |
End Buds | Not sure | Not sure | Not sure |
Special Features | Corky growth | Not sure | Not sure |
Identified? | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Alternatives Offered | Celtis lavigata | 48 | 0 |
Quercus shumardii (Shumard oak) |
Cephalanthus occidentalis (Buttonbush) |
|
Growth Habit | Tree | Shrub |
Habitat | Mesic | Flooded |
Leaf Type | Broadleaf | Broadleaf |
Flower Color | Not sure | Not sure |
Fruit Type | Not sure | Not sure |
Broadleaf Type | Simple | Simple |
Lobes | Lobed | Not lobed |
Edges | Toothed | Entire |
Shape | Oval, widest above middle | Oval, widest below middle |
Thickness | Thin | Thin |
Broadleaf Arrangement | Alternate | Opposite |
Bundle Scars | Not sure | Not sure |
Leaf Scars | Not sure | Not sure |
End Buds | Not sure | Not sure |
Special Features | Not sure | Not sure |
Identified? | Yes | No |
Alternatives Offered | Nyssa sylvatica, Quercus michauxii | 7 |
The app included the correct species in all but one of the test queries. Buttonbush is in their database as a possibility for my locale, but for some reason, the list of characteristics (all of which correctly describe the species) failed to offer it as a possibility. The list of possible species containing persimmon is much too long, but that means looking at a few of the characteristics I skipped. Accurately describing a tree's bark is very difficult in most cases, so it's not a surprise that they left it out of the interview process. However, adding bark as a characteristic could have nailed the identification of persimmon. The other three species would have been easily identifiable using this app.
Although there is room for improvement, this is still the best, most comprehensive tool of its kind that I've seen. For those with a real interest in trees, particularly if you find yourself in new territory, this app is sure to deliver a real education and a lot of fun.
No comments:
Post a Comment